Back to threaded view Full conversation · 5 posts

Practicing Bestiality won’t disqualify someone from being hired by the FBI. Kash is a dingbat.

jimbasil 55069 posts Joined:
Posted

(no message)

Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
  • Level 1

    So, you want to punish childhood victims of sex trafficking who were forced into bestiality by never

    allowing them to be employed by the government?!!!

    You are a cold MF.

    Patel's response to Dem senator going for a "gotcha moment" from the linked article of the hearing::
    "We did not want to punish victims of bestiality, victims who were trafficked. We did not want to make it an automatic disqualification for the FBI to consider you if were a victim of these awful, heinous acts," Patel said. "We are not going to target victims and prevent them from serving in their capacity to serve this country."
    The questioning spanned partisan lines, with Republican Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana grilling Patel about the rationale for a change that the FBI director said was proposed to him by subordinates.

    "When you saw bestiality, I say this with respect: The person who recommended it, why didn't you just say what planet did you parachute in from?" Kennedy asked.

    Patel conceded that was his initial response, but "they then explained to me and showed me cases in which people were forced into it and applied to the FBI and so I thought they should be considered. It's not an automatic disqualification."

    In other words, Patel is saying that he chose to screen the cases for trafficking victims and reject the remainder of the true bestiality candidates.

    Link: https://www.newsmax.com/us/kash-patel-crime-fbi/2026/09/15/id/1269499/

    • Level 2

      I was watching that. Laughed out loud.

      Those poor guys who were forced to fuck horses by evil traffickers (?) can still serve in the FBI.

      Makes total sense. Totally what the rule change meant to target.

      Not surprised that you buy it.

      • Level 3

        While I am filling in jim's gaps on this, I surmise that traffickers make porn movies with them

        When Patel said "No" initially, FBI agents under him (agents who were also working under Biden) showed him specific cases of it.

        The reason that the y were being rejected is because a background search came up with the videos, I would presume.
        The agents showed him specific cases - so yeah, you may laugh out loud at how horrible people can be, but there they are.

        I am glad that you had such a privileged childhood that this never happened to you. I guess since this line of questioning involves trying to make someone on the other side of the political aisle look bad instead of compassionate, you can laugh at those victims, and ban them from holding a job.
        "Ha! Screw them! It's for the Liberal Agenda! You've got to break a few eggs to make an omelette!"

End of conversation