Back to threaded view Full conversation · 13 posts

Iran was ready to unleash it's nukes if it got them.

BaronVonZemo 64267 posts Joined:
Posted

"Burchett warns Iran was preparing to ‘launch Armageddon’ before Trump intervention
The world is safer under President Donald Trump, Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., said Sunday, arguing the president’s decisive stance on Iran helped prevent what he described as a potential nuclear disaster in the Middle East.

"We live in a safe world because Donald J. Trump is in the White House," Burchett said on Burchett said on Fox News' "The Big Weekend Show."

"The Iranians were close to nuclear; they were getting ready to launch Armageddon, from what I understand," Burchett said. "If President Trump [had not] intervened over there, Iran would have a nuclear weapon."

Burchett added that Tehran likely would have launched a nuclear strike against Israel "or somebody else."

"That's why he had so much support from other Middle Eastern Muslim nations — because they knew they didn't want any more of that," Burchett said. "They don't want to see their kids dying any more than we do, and yet the media will not give us any credit for that."

Burchett’s remarks came as Trump warned Tehran that it "better behave" amid escalating regional tensions.

Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst reported Sunday that Trump is in "deciding mode" over potential strikes while warning that "big things" could happen if the regime fails to comply.

Posted by Emma Bussey

  • Level 1

    Tim Burchett is a real expert on the subject.

    Tim Burchett was opposed to U.S. military intervention against Iran, calling Senators Lindsey Graham and Ted Cruz "war pimps" for their advocacy for bombing Iran. Burchett said there was no "just cause" for military intervention, stating "I just don't see American boys and girls going to a faraway land that many of us couldn't even find on a map. Again, the Israelis can handle this thing. Let's let them handle it."[60] However, after President Trump ordered strikes on Iranian nuclear sites in 2025, Burchett endorsed Trump's decision, saying that Trump had made the "right move".

    Kind of reminds me of when Rocket Ismail played for Notre Dame
    Invincibility with no vulnerability
  • Level 1

    That’s ridiculous. Just the opinion of some oaf Rep from Tennessee.

    They were not close to acquiring nuclear weapons.

    You posted straight-up fiction.

  • Level 1

    For the record, I was in support of attacking Iran…

    however, I’m not completely sold on the notion that Iran was close to having nukes.

    Burchett’s comment, “from what I understand,,” says the same thing. This article seems like nothing more than a mid-term campaign strategy.

    Back to Iran…how the hell doss Iran still have short and medium range missile launching capabilities? Also with our superior technology, we should be able to contain their drone attacks as well.

    We're all born bald baby!
    • Level 2

      Drones are cheap to build...cheaper than the defensive weapons we use against them.

      That is not a sustainable model of war...expending ammunition 10x the cost of the other side, one for one. If Ukraine has shown us anything it is that future wars will not be quick, they will be attritional. That means that stockpiles are not as relevant as replenishability when it comes to munitions. More important than anything Trump can do is to restore munitions production (both smart and dumb) to the United States. Tariffs are helping that.

      Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
      • Level 3

        How do tariffs help replenish munitions?…

        Tariffs are hardly helping the economy let alone the military.

        We're all born bald baby!
        • Level 4

          They bring manufacturing jobs back to the US from China and other countries.

          Modern munitions are more than gun powder and shells.

          One of the most important industries we had in WWII that led to our success was the automotive industry. We were able to convert that to tank, jeep, etc. manufacturing very quickly.

          Semiconductors will be key to any future war. If China is able to cut us off from 90% of the world's semiconductor and printed circuit board manufacturing by "quaranteening" or even attacking Taiwan, we will be in trouble...unless we have already started building semiconductor fabs in the US. They take a long time to build. We need more of them here, within our borders.

          US companies have been shipping technology manufacturing lines, and even research & development, to China to be made there more cheaply than it can be made here. Technologies that China just doesn't have are being handed to them. China can nationalize that technology at a moment's notice, but for now, they are just slowly hiring people from those US companies, and employing them at state funded startups...and R&D personnel are going to work for their giant academic research institutes which are entirely funded by the PRC. Good luck suing one of those entities for trade secret theft. Tariffs keep new product lines from being transferred to China, just so a US company can meet Wall Street expectations every quarter. Tariff's are long term, not quarterly, solutions. China thinks long term; we think quarterly.

          Right now, China is analogous to what the United States was in 1935, and the current US is analogous to what Germany was in 1935. Germany had technology (better weapons across the board), but we had the economic and personnel resources to fight a sustained war. The current US has the technology, but China has the economic and personnel resources to fight a sustained war.

          Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
        • Level 4

          Trumpian magic.

          (no message)
End of conversation