Abdul El-Sayed answers Pro-Life student's question on why he should vote for him...
...the exchange was thoughtful and civil, as you can see....
Comments...
-8
#643229
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 23 posts
-
Level 1
Since no Pro-Life respondent disagreed with El-Sayed's reasoning, can we agree that the best
solution for reducing abortions is to focus on a) making contraceptives available everywhere...b) provide sex/sexuality education to all age groups...and c) fund programs that make it tenable for women to carry pregnancies to term...while not harming women by having government force/coerce them into being just "Vessels" of reproduction with no say in the matter ... denying them access to medically safe abortion procedures...
-
Level 1
Abdul is seductive and slick... like Clinton, Obama, Mamdani. Pure politicians!
But the act gets old eventually and has nothing to do with governing.
-
Level 2
Apt response. El-Sayed is trying to conceal his true nature...and someone here is desperately...
TakethetrainKnute36131 posts...working to assist him in any way he can.
Party over country is starkly on display in this race.
-
Level 3
El-Sayed gave a very cogent and specific response to why a Pro-Life student should support him...
surely you can muster a response to the points he made on an issue you care a lot about...let's hear what you have to say about the content of his reply.
-
-
Level 2
Please address the content of his reply to the Pro-Life student...i.e. how best to reduce the number
number of abortions.
-
-
Level 1
Kamala and Abdul - your dream team.
(no message)Link: match made in hell
Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat.-
Level 2
Kamala and Piker…not sure who’s advising him. Tyrone’s wet dream team though…
TakethetrainKnute36131 posts(no message)-
-
Level 4
Another post w/o addressing the OP...what's keeping you?...this topic has to be at the top of every
Pro-Lifer's list on this Forum...why no responses?
-
-
Level 3
And...Once Again, NO comment on El-Sayed's response to the Pro-Life Student...
must be something(s) he said...
-
-
Level 2
Not a bad combo...but back to the OP...any comments on El-Sayed's response to the Pro-Life student?
(no message)-
Level 3
Say anything to get elected; do anything once elected. The guy is a dog murdering charlatan.
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat.-
Level 4
What do you have to say about his approach to reducing the number of abortions...and the
reasoning he uses?
-
Level 5
Don't care. He's a wolf in sheeps clothing in the mold of Obama.
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat.-
Level 6
Tyrone, El-Sayed and a pro-life student...are two wolves & a lamb voting on what to have for dinner.
TakethetrainKnute36131 posts(no message) -
Level 6
Why are you so afraid to address the content of El-Sayed's response?...it's a subject that based
upon other posts you've made is very important to you...do you disagree with his approach to reducing the number of abortions?...if not, why?
-
-
-
Level 4
You mean like, “I’m the peace president, no new wars, I don’t start wars”. Or “prosperity
jimbasil55264 postsfor all under my leadership”. Or “I can’t show my taxes because they’re under audit”. Or “we have the best HC plan we will show you in two weeks”. Or “the Mexicans will pay for the wall”. …
You mean statements like that? Or do you mean something different?
Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 5
Trump 2.0 has not followed through on his promises no doubt, but still beats the DSA platform.
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat.-
Level 6
You mean, he would say anything to be elected?
jimbasil55264 posts(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 7
I think his situation is somewhat worse: he's been compromised. But even at his worst: NOT Kamala!
(no message)Dead-eye Pete with 20 pounds of swingin' meat.
-
-
-
-
-
Level 5
He explains his approach and reasoning on how to reduce abortions...what are your thoughts on them?
For instance, are women with unwanted pregnancies to be thought of as simply reproductive 'vessels' with no say in the matter?
-
-
-
-
End of conversation