of children that he enabled. Joey is officially on PP's Mt. Rushmore devoted to the Murderer's Row of All-Time Infanticide Sluggers. Only two or three men did more to ensure that fewer people with Down Syndrome and Spina Bifida plague this beautiful world of ours. What a legacy! Way to go, Joe! This...this...is what a good Catholic does.
But I suppose that folks who get pregnant willy nilly just don't take life and responsibility seriously.
It's probably best that these folks do not reproduce.
Miserable…pity you weren’t born female…
of the evil that he supported.
I hope that those voices sincerely seek forgiveness as well.
world, Pope Francis empowered all RCC priests to forgive women and health care providers their choice of abortion and not simply excommunicate them. Hopefully, those who claim to be Pro-Life, but show no understanding or mercy toward the victims of completely un-wanted and unsought pregnancies will seek forgiveness for the harm they force on such women by denying them professional medical care.
Women are not just Reproductive 'Vessels' that can be used by anyone, at any time. That cannot be the objective of a Loving God.
reproductive lives (see link)...now do the math for a worldwide total population of 8.3B people...noting the treatment of women throughout the world.
Keep in mind these posts of yours are archived...when you make false claims, they'll come back to bite you.
As for archiving, it's you that loses that battle every time with your fabrication of others' statements and denial of your own.
The study I gave you clearly spells out how their conclusion was reached…if you think there aren’t any coerced pregnancies you are grossly mistaken.
Sadly, far too many people refuse to respect the true “Sine Qua Non” Person in this debate…the Woman. They recognize the heinous and unjust nature of forced and coerced pregnancies, but offer no mercy, whatsoever…rendering her nothing more than a simple biological machine. That is flat out wrong…and I encourage you to engage further to cement this argument.
Go look at what the "study" includes under "sexual coercion." After rape, it gets hilarious.
You know this.
definition of "Coerced Pregnancy"...btw, the association that represents Baron's specialty...hardly a group of 'Baby Killers'...
Such pregnancies are definitely not at all what the victims wanted...and not what the RCC condones. So...where does this leave the woman/victim?...what should be her options?...care to offer an opinion and justification?
Pregnancy from rape or with the threat of violence is coerced pregnancy. Secretly ripping condoms? Sure.
The rest of the umbrella contains laughable stuff that falls under bad judgment and buyer's remorse. Hurt feelings? Making promises that are unfulfilled? Repeatedly asking for sex?
Pregnancies from that are NOT coerced. Only an imbecile or an ugly feminist would say otherwise.
Which are you?
impregnated by Stepfathers...P Diddys kicking girlfriends around...and Jeffrey Epsteins luring and trafficking young girls into situations where unwanted pregnancies are sure to happen.
Getting back to numbers, a JAMA study estimated that approximately 64,500 pregnancies resulted from rape across 14 U.S. states with total abortion bans in the roughly 16-18 month period following the overturning of Roe v Wade in 2022. The vast majority of these...about 59,000...occurred in states that do not provide exceptions for rape.
You can quibble all you want about exact numbers...but the reality is that large numbers of forced and totally unwanted pregnancies represent reality.
What's also reality is that the wealthy victims can fly to find good medical care, while those who are not so lucky end up either self-aborting, or seeking out a "Back Alley" provider...i.e. the Reality of Pre-Roe v Wade America.
In Reality, government imposed abortion bans don't stop abortions...they only cause more harm to millions of innocent women. There is a better way to achieve the Real Goal of Reducing the number of abortions...a) Contraceptive Availability...b) Sex/Sexuality Education for ALL ages...and c) Funding for programs that make it tenable for women to carry unwanted pregnancies to term.
1 - No one is being "forced" to carry these to term.
2 - We now know that you're tucking in bogus claims of coercion in your statement. You know, quite well, that this debate isn't about "right to choose/right to life." It's your fabricated "stat" about coerced pregnancies.
You've been exposed (again) and lost (again).
criminally and financially threaten physicians over the slightest hint of an unapproved abortion...Definitely Forces Women to carry totally unjust and unwanted pregnancies to term...unless they take the risk of Self, or Back Alley, abortions. It's exactly what women had to live with prior to Roe v Wade...i.e. tens of thousands of women harmed by Sepsis Infections, or Death over Forced or Coerced pregnancies that even the RCC admits is heinous and wrong...and what the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists has strongly opposed for decades...they're the ones who see the after effects in ERs.
These are results for how does the overturning of Roe v Wade force women. with unwanted pregnancies to carry them to term?
AI Overview
The overturning of Roe v. Wade removes the federal constitutional right to abortion, allowing individual states to ban or severely restrict the procedure and legally compel pregnant individuals to continue unwanted pregnancies to term.
[Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health]
Ending Federal Protection
The Supreme Court's 2022 decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization erased 50 years of precedent under the 14th Amendment.
This ruling removed the nationwide baseline that protected a person's choice to end a pregnancy before fetal viability.
[Center for Reproductive Rights]
State-Level Bans and Criminalization
Authority over abortion laws returned to individual state legislatures.
Over a dozen states enacted near-total abortion bans and criminal penalties for healthcare providers.
With local clinics closed or barred from performing the procedure, pregnant individuals in these states lose local access to safe, legal abortion care.
[National Institutes of Health (NIH) | (.gov)]
Barriers to Out-of-State Care
While some individuals travel to states where abortion remains legal, severe practical barriers exist.
High costs for travel, lodging, childcare, and time off work make out-of-state care impossible for many low-income patients.
These legal and financial bottlenecks leave pregnancy continuation as the only accessible or lawful option
--------------
post that addresses facets not covered in yours...this is a "Forum"...let's make sure everyone gets heard...not just one side.
Link: https://forum.uhnd.com/forum/index.php?action=display&forumid=2&msgid=643229
Honors from both Planned Parenthood and Notre Dame. I wonder which entity is more embarrassed...or perhaps neither really cares.
Respect to former U.S. Ambassador to the Vatican, Mary Ann Glendon, for turning down the Laetare in 2009 due to Obama's attendance at the Commencement.
At the time she said the decision to present Obama with an honorary degree violated the U.S. bishops’ 2004 request that Catholic institutions not honor “those who act in defiance of our fundamental moral principles.”
(The University did not invite Clinton in 1993.)
Link: Rescind Biden's Laetare.
Prudential Judgement when making their choice. Try to learn from their example.
