How is the Parental Rights Bill in FL NOT a solution in search of a problem? Who's smart enough to
explain it?
I live in this state and haven't heard one story of school, teacher, curriculum teaching sex or gender Ed to 3rd graders or lower.
Replies to: How is the Parental Rights Bill in FL NOT a solution in search of a problem? Who's smart enough to
Codified dog whistle.
Teachers Who Insist They're Not Teaching Your Kid About Sex Also Weirdly Outraged By Ban On Doing So
(no message)
Link: https://babylonbee.com/news/teachers-who-insist-theyre-not-teaching-your-kid-about-sex-also-weirdly-outraged-by-ban-on-teaching-your-kid-about-sex
Lol…yes, exactly.
(no message)
If you think gender modeling isnt happening in early school, then this law isnt a problem for you.
(no message)
Not once in K-12 was this ever discussed in my classes
Stick to the basics.
Listen when my wife was in grade school many years ago she was taught sex education by a woman who
told the entire girls class about fellatio on a boy. When the girls expressed discuss she told them to try it you might like it. She was eight years old at a Miami grade school in the 70’s. I’m just happy my wife took her advice.
Almost fell over with that one. My wife's advice came on the streets and dorms of college. I was ok
with that kind of woke if that is what it is. I think it was just free sex in the 60's, free sex in the 70's, wear rubbers or you might get Aids in the 80's.
me, too.
(no message)
See, now that was funny. Chad is gonna Will Smith your ass!
(no message)
At least Will Smith has offered a less offensive term for "bitch slap"...so there is some good to
...come out of this.
I would have slapped him if I didn’t know he would like that.
(no message)
He was the curve breaker in his first grade Bondage and Discipline class...
(no message)
The old school cure for Peyronie’s, eh?
(no message)
TMI
(no message)
The problem is that most people do not want their kids confused.
Clinton had this about right: Don's ask don't tell.
The problem is that those who suffer from internal conflicts and anxieties are desperately seeking external affirmation that they are OK.
They will never be appeased because their problems are internal not external.
Couldn't the exact same thing be said for the "anti-lynching" bill that was just passed?
(no message)
Please Google Ahmaud Arbery.
(no message)
I don't think you know what a "lynching" is.
(no message)
Seems like a solution in search of Jussie Smollett...
(no message)
It’s been a mere 41 years since the last lynching. Feels like yesterday.
(no message)
So...you agree it's a solution then...
(no message)
Re: How is the Parental Rights Bill in FL NOT a solution in search of a problem? Who's smart enough to
Apparently you have not seen all the videos of gay teachers being upset they cant discuss their private lives with students. Do you really think there would be so much uproar if they weren't doing it anyway?? Also, there is more to the bill than just the point you and the media are so outraged about. This isn't just preemptive. Broward County has guidelines that give the schools the ability to transition a student without the parents knowledge. If you people dont see a problem with this I'm not sure what to say anymore besides the collapse of every society is from sexual perversion. Congrats
Did Project Veritas produce these videos?
(no message)
Apparently actual videos, regardless of who records them, are no longer valid for evidence?
(no message)
Not for dudes like Quest & Jim. If they hate the source the story cannot be true.
Sometimes even sources they trust. See the NYT and Hunter Biden story. Both flat deny it and or twist themselves into knots explaining it away.
I linked an article where several states have mandatory LGBQT curriculum for kids.
Florida is getting ahead of this bullshit. Q (and Ty and Jim and Chris) are lying about this bill.
Damn is, yr taking over Ty's job of linking. Come on man!
(no message)
The bill is disappointing I agree. It should be K-12.
(no message)
Yep, then your kid goes carnival freak crazy once they smell freedom and independent think.
(no message)
How about learning the three Rs and leave the rest to the parents? What a novel idea!
(no message)
We were told that was patently stupid. No kids need to hear about Javier and Steven antiquing...
...and paddle boarding. And being "Best Person" at Trinity and Allysin's non-denominational nonbinary non confirming life partner bonding ceremony complete with matching tattoos and clitoris piercing.
I know prohibiting such makes some posters want to scream out of his vagina, but it's inappropriate and unnecessary. The intent of which it to normalize behaviors parents teach against at home, with no transparency or input. And should you raise an objection you're a homophobe and bigot.
Call it what it is....child grooming.
Makes too much sense.
(no message)
"Train up a child in the way he should go, And when he is old he will not depart from it."
Then again, based on your stances on almost every issue, I am guessing you are not too much of a Bible believer. I would speculate that in well over 80% of all confused children cases regarding gender identity, there is a lack of a traditional nuclear family present. Children up through young adulthood desire and need a core nuclear family that teach and nurture them through struggles.
^^ THIS, THIS A THOUSAND TIMES THIS ^^
Exactly post Mac.
So, only what is not taught can impact later behaviors?
(no message)
So it's preemptive then.
I have no problem with preemptively stopping such education for K-3.
You have to preempt anything the teachers unions might think, say, or do.
(no message)
Yes, that's what governemnt should do preempt all laws for the JIC. If that doesn't sound crazy to
you then you're not a rational person.
Before you accuse me, you should take a look at yourself. I know it sounds scary.
(no message)
So you demand 5-8 year old victims first? How many victims before it's not "crazy"?
Yeah, that's not crazy either.
I really don't have strong opinions on this law, maybe it is pointless, but at least it's well-meaning and at worst it does no harm. What's the controversy?
But I do strongly believe that sex and gender ed should not be taught to K-3. Maybe you want to take a stab at the question I asked of JB the other day: "Why are you so fired up over a law that you say is pointless?"
If it was just "it's a solution in search of a problem", people would laugh it off and move on. Instead there are people here (like you) creating multiple threads on it and apparently protests going on over it, I don't get it. Maybe you can explain.
That would require rational thought, which Q has proven time and again he/she is incapable of.
(no message)
Maybe he/she is angling for a spot on "The View".
(no message)