"Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021"
Well, at least they went to the effort of narrowing the scope of the warrant to specific documents. Apparently not a fishing expedition.
Replies to: "Any government and/or Presidential Records created between January 20, 2017, and January 20, 2021"
And also consider how broad the "classified" definition is as well.
(no message)
Including those clothes made for Melania in her closet during that period?
(no message)
Ned — were soldiers in your artillery unit allowed to take home swag bags of top secret documents?
Do you recall the military security protocols re encryption codes for radio traffic in the 1980s? I do. The takeaway was that one would be taken out back and shot if we fucked up in handling encryption codes. I heard dat shit Lima Charlie. [Loud ân Clear]
Now, maybe you served under a different flag than me, but the United States of America flag that I humbly and proudly served under made pretty clear that our national security interests were non negotiable. America first.
So I am curious why you are OK with a Commander in Chief leaving office and taking Top Secret shit with him in violation of protocol, and refusing to return it when asked nicely, and refusing to do so after receiving a subpoena?
Was it OK in your ragtag outfit to play âkeep awayâ with classified documents for months and months?
Have you lost your mind?
What exact doc do you want? The search warrant isn't specific. This is an armed fishing expedition
We don't do this in this country, Conor, not in the past 200 years. I am sure disputes happened before between ex presidents and archivists. Anyone else get raided?
There is good cause why this search warrant is unprecedented.
No other US President was ever cavalier in handling classified documents because they understood the risks that Americans and American assets took in obtaining the intelligence in the first place. Respecting the national security protocols in handling classified material = respect for those who gather the intelligence. Trump never gave a shit about anyone other than himself.
No other US President ever stole classified documents upon leaving office.
No other US President would have refused to return classified material, even when asked discreetly to do so, and certainly after receiving a subpoena.
No other US President would contemplate using the classified material for personal or monetary gain, or destroying the classified material.
No other US President would risk having the classified material fall into the wrong hands. Mar-a-Lago is not a secure facility.
Even giving Trump every benefit of the doubt (why would we?), his actions regarding this classified material was egregious. The execution of the search warrant was the proper remedy.
There is no reason for any POTUS to physically take classified documents from the Whitehouse
other than to monetize them.
A POTUS once no longer the president still has access to information.
Letâs say he didnât want to make money or monetize them, he just wanted mementos. As much as 35 boxes/containers of documents? Nope, it doesnât fit. He wanted to make money and or use them for personal gain.
He is a traitor to America.
Take a look at some prosecutions for taking classified material:
Kind of like when you claimed to be part of the first unit to train on Iwo Jima?
Simple Google search proved you were not telling the truth.
Great point. Nice job noticing that. Sure...they weren't on a fishing expedition.
(no message)
Anther one who needs to read the warrant, then look up those annoying federal statutes listed.
Wouldn’t it have been more effective to publicly demand return of the documents?
Give Trump a Dump a chance to respond, the. Raid him.
Taking the raid approach really does play into the theory that this is political theater.
It is an espionage investigation.
(no message)
Seriously? After all that has been reported during the 8 + long months
of requests, meetings with government officials, subpoenas, privately and publicly wasnât enough time?
If you stole top secret documents from the whitehouse, how much time would you be given before you were led away in shackles??
Donât be a moron all of the time, please!
According to Trumps atty they were cooperating then the line went dead for months.
Then the raid. Up until the point....where the government stopped communicating with team trump....all had been going according to plan. So why did they do this? Then follow it up with a show of force? Curious chain of events.
Co-operating, as in delivered the documents when requested?
(no message)
According to his attorney that is correct.
I fully appreciate should could not be telling the truth. For months the Feds and Team Trump were communicating and then suddenly the Feds stopped. As she called it "a gap" between their conversations and the raid.
This would be very easy to verify so it wouldn't behoove her to lie. But she could be.
Nothing was going as planned. Trump stalled, delayed, lied and would not
return all documents. The DOJ put out a list and dates of all contact with Trump and his lawyers. He has as given a subpoena in June.
He should have returned the documents immediately upon first request. He didnât.
The FBI wanted to keep the search quiet but Trump wanted to play the very victim.
It backfired.
He stole classified and top secret info from America.
FUCK TRUMP.
Links for "list and dates of all contact with Trump" and "FBI wanted to keep the search quite[sic]"
as you asserted would be much appreciated, I could not find anything in NYT.
BTW, do you have any information as to any non-classified documents being taken mistakenly or otherwise in the 35 boxes? Just asking, I cannot fin any information about that.
He is not with one iota of your time.
He does not have the mental capacity to comprehend what you are saying.
Thanks for your “one iota”, MAGA Man. .
(no message)
NBC had it.i assume every news outlet has it.
(no message)
That's what's being reported by the media. I would take it with a grain of salt.
They have demonstrated time and again to not throw straight dice when it comes to the former president.
Here is a NYTIMES article on the timeline.
PS: Iâm not sure if it says in the article that the records people had to reconstruct several torn up documents that were returned to them in spring.
There was fear he may have torn up or shredded needed highly sensitive files that were still missing from the fist set of boxes he returned.
Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/12/us/politics/trump-classified-records-timeline.html
Hillary has none.
(no message)
A fishing expedition? These are classified and top secret documents - fishing expedition?
All documents taken by DJTRUMP are to be taken back. None of them are his to take.
Whereâs the disconnect with you people?
My warrant for raiding your house will be for "every document you created after age 18"
Then, when I find one I think I can make a case on (or at least state to the media that I can make a case on), I can claim the warrant is not a fishing expedition by your logic, and you are guilty. Great logic, Jim.
Trump took up to 35 boxes of classified, sensitive, and top secret files from the Whitehouse.
Which part of that are you missing. Over the past 8 months and more he was told to return them. He delayed, lied and delayed the order. Documents he as an ordinary citizen isnât allowed to have. In fact itâs a crime to have any classified material. None.
Alas, he didnât return all files hence a warrant with a search of his residence.
To play stupid on this is mind boggling.
I would not say that having secret service security goes along with being an ordinary citizen.
(no message)
And, and so.
(no message)
You seem to be missing my point, and trying to make your own one.
Regarding your point, that Trump had illegal documents, I'll wait and see. You guys have no credibility. The walls are always closing in. The indictments are always coming. After years of lies and baseless statements, I will continue to wait until something actual happens. Reality can change my opinions. Your baseless statements do not.
You’ll wait and see will you? Pavement has more going on than most of you
(no message)
Define “records.”
(no message)
Read the warrant, counsellor.
Boiler blate to cover everything under the sun... show me the supporting affidavit.
(no message)
So I'll ask again. Have you renounced your support for Trump yet?
(no message)
Asking again: Who t.f. are you?
(no message)
Apologies, confused you with shoe obsessed Aragoto.
(no message)
Weird post.
(no message)
He’s the guy who still rides around with his Biden/Harris bumper sticker on his car.
(no message)
Not the kind who cares to answer questions from a cunt, Irish usage of the word of course.
(no message)
I'd do the same if I were irrelevant. Smart choice.
(no message)
Can’t use that word. You will be banned.
(no message)
McSweeney, is that you?
(no message)
No but I like McSorley's in New York.
(no message)
Be good or be gone!
(no message)
The guy with 32 posts.
(no message)
Answered below. Have you renounced your support for Merrick Garland yet?
Or Hillary, for destroying evidence?
Merrick Garland doesn't play. Speaks softly, carries big stick. Busted Trump like a piñata.
(no message)
đŚ
(no message)
Another guy who doesn't care about the Constitution. Ends justify the means.
(no message)
You are speaking of Trump and his supporters?
(no message)