Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 61 posts
-
Level 1
The R Party is the defund FBI party and hate the police party. Well done.
jimbasil55161 posts(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 2
The D party is the party of BLM / antifa and the arson, killings, looting of the peaceful protests.
(no message)-
Level 3
Oh really? Killings, like Kyle Rittenhouse or Travis and Gregory McMichael and William Bryan? Tell
jimbasil55161 postsus about all the killers and then tell us about the Capitol building and tell us about the Proud Boys demonstrations and QAnon and all the other
militant groups you champion.Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk-
Level 4
And was there death and destruction and arson and looting? Did Rs bail these people out?
Were communities and cities shut down like the D / BLM riots shut down neighborhoods forever? And what about the attack on the Portland police station by D/BLM rioters? I can play this tit for tat game all day. You open your big mouth, safely from your little hide away, where none of this affects you.
-
-
-
Level 2
The FBI aren't the "police," Jim.
People are smart enough to tell the obvious differences.
I will repeat again how unbelievable it is that the Dems have become the party that tells the people to trust the freaking FBI and CIA and intelligence community. Unreal, that flip, and all because those entities have been weaponized against Lucifer incarnate, Donald J. Trump. You'd have to be historically illiterate to trust the FBI and CIA, given all the chicanery and deception and immoral activities those agencies have perpetrated for many decades. I used to have most on the left with me on this, but, you know, Trump happened, so those sorts of principles, along with free speech/expression went out the window.
-
Level 3
That’s totally weird. I post after one poster and it goes under another.
jimbasil55161 posts(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk -
Level 3
Good for you MAS. Do you want your crayons now?
jimbasil55161 posts(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk -
Level 3
MAS - these are the same people now singing the praises of Liz Cheney. She is a Patriot.
She has integrity and sacrificed her career. Not that being a politician should be a career but she did it.
I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!
-
-
Level 2
Well, defund the FBI, of course. Not hate the police, though. They do good work.
(no message)Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good. -
-
Level 3
The Capitol police will argue that.
jimbasil55161 posts(no message)Jack, he is a banker
and Jane, she is a clerk
-
-
Level 2
Link?
(no message)I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!-
Level 3
Crenshaw thinks for himself. He doesn’t need Trump’s help or endorsement…
On top of that, he’s a freaking war hero. The guy is exactly what the Republican Party needs.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 4
Doesn't make him infallible. Crenshaw has his opinion. Tucker has his.
It appears that Dan doesn't dig the R rank and file voicing their opinions. It also is apparent that if a R has an opinion that that differs with DJT, that R becomes the darling of the left until they are done with that person.
-
Level 5
Tucker is a dopey talking head..:
His opinion doesn’t matter. Crenshaw is a man of action who makes a difference in his constituents lives. What he says matters and he leads by example.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 6
I’m curious. What has Crenshaw done to make a difference in his constituents lives?
Now, I’ll get you saying he is a war hero. I guess he gets that title for losing an eye in battle. He is more of a Patriot than anyone who hasn’t served. The word Patriot now has lost any real meaning since it is thrown around on politicians strictly based on their hatred for Trump.
But I’m really curious to see what good ol Dan has done to make his area of Texas better.
I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!-
Level 7
Here’s a list of bills introduced, passed, and brought into law…
I’d say he represents his constituents very well.
Link: https://www.congress.gov/member/dan-crenshaw/C001120
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 8
Well, glad to see a politician who actually works. He does support the money pit that is the
Ukraine and sooner or later, we need to get them off the US's tit. That money can be used at home instead of overseas.
I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!-
Level 9
Wrong…
If we let the Ukraine fall, that would mean a victory for Putin. He’s the enemy. It’s too bad you and others don’t see this. Oh, and the money used to support the Ukraine doesn’t take away from the Fed’s hapless domestic spend.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 10
If Vlad is that bad, we need to handle him ourselves rather than letting some 3rd world country
Handle him. I see him as the enemy but don’t support keeping the Ukraine on the US’s tit. You guys continue to think we are supporting Putin because we don’t want to continue sending Zelensky money and free weapons. You’ll never change my mind and I won’t change yours on this.
I do enjoy seeing politicians and movie stars walking around the Ukraine that is supposed to be a war zone. Do you have your Zelensky action figure sitting on your desk so you can stroke it?
I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!-
Level 11
Putin is that bad…
and no, I don’t think we should jump in with troops unless he attacks a NATO country.
I’m all for proxy wars if possible.
We're all born bald baby! -
Level 11
No, the worst is when Zelensky and his wife come over here for a Vogue Magazine photo shoot as...
his country is being destroyed and then he tries to guilt-trip us into believing that we aren't sending him enough money. He's a self-serving ingrate, but no one has the guts to tell him to shut up and pound sand when he acts like a spoiled child.
-
Level 12
Well, he is Ben Stillers hero. I’m sure Zelensky will have a cameo in Ben’s next movie.
(no message)I hold the record for most deleted posts. +150. Favorite posters must be protected!
-
-
-
Level 10
What are the criteria by which we are judging the effectiveness of the billions we're sending there?
And I doubt there is anyone here who sees Putin as anything other than a murderous autocrat. Are all murderous autocrats/theocrats our enemies? If so, which ones should we devote our time, lives, and money to defeating?
-
Level 11
I think it’s safe to say that without our funding/weapons, the Ukraine would have…
fallen by now.
Putin is the immediate threat. Ask anyone that you know in Eastern Europe. The guy wants to re-establish the old Soviet Union. Unfortunately for him, he fucked around and found out that the Ukrainian people are willing to fight and possibly die for their homeland. It would be the same in Poland and other neighboring countries.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 12
Yeah, I expect more concrete and explainable markers of success than that.
Our foreign interventionist community depends upon nebulous terms and hazy measuring sticks.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 7
His record in Congress is unremarkable. He's more about being a personality than a legislator.
(no message)-
Level 8
Wrong. He actually does work. Read my response to Tampa
(no message)We're all born bald baby!-
Level 9
Yeah, I saw it. I wouldn't use that record as a means of demonstrating his effectiveness.
Most of the bills that include his name were introduced by someone else and he is merely a co-sponsor, along with 100+ other members of Congress. Looking at the last year and a half, only one has passed the House and most of the rest have died in committee. Probably a better way to measure how well he serves his constituents, seeing that he represents a district in Texas, is what he has voted against.
I look at the list you linked and right near the top, I see a bill that would create a new "lend-lease" arrangement with Taiwan. I doubt most of his constituents think we should be sending millions to Taiwan at this time, and also raising tensions with China, as we are doing with Ukraine and Russia. It's the sort of move that wins plaudits in the media and in DC but generally isn't popular with the people these days.
-
Level 10
How do you measure a congressman’s effectiveness?…
Maybe getting re-elected? That, in my humble opinion, would be the ultimate measure, yes? If not…let me know.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 11
No, I wouldn't agree about that.
For a member of the House, I think it's simple: does he/she enact policies that benefit or protect most of his constituents most of the time.
-
Level 12
So, if he’s not effectively representing his constituents, he wouldn’t be re-elected, right?
(no message)We're all born bald baby!-
Level 13
No, that does not follow. Are you familiar with Feinstein, Waters, Swalwell, et al?
People are reelected for all sorts of reasons. One of the biggest reasons is simply name recognition. It happens at all levels of government, actually.
-
Level 14
Good point. How many voters are “thoughtful voters”?…
I don’t know the answer, but when I vote, I research every single bill and candidate.
We're all born bald baby!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Level 6
Crenshaw is a complete lightweight. I've listened to his podcast.
He'd be eaten alive if he went on Tucker.
-
Level 7
Yawn. You listen to his podcast….looks like you know Crenshaw to a T.
(no message)We're all born bald baby!-
Level 8
Oh, I didn't know that you knew him personally. Is he as handsome in person as he appears...
on that thar tellervision?
-
Level 9
Never met the guy, but I have talked to a few men that served with him…
(no message)We're all born bald baby!-
Level 10
I assume most people, including him, are decent people. That has nothing to do with his record or
intellect. He certainly comes off as approachable and normal.
-
-
-
-
-
Level 6
Tucker might be a dopey talking head, but he's a lot smarter & more successful than you.
(no message)-
-
-
Level 9
Oh, now that’s rubbish…
We have a number of posters that are successful in life. You measure success by $$$. That’s OK. I do too in some ways, but there are better ways.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 10
Look, you are all into our involvement in Ukraine. Dan is your guy.
It happens that Tucker and some posters here don't agree. That's why you resent the guy. Tucker's stance on Ukraine. He is paid to do exactly what he is doing, whether you like it or not. Dan Crenshaw is wrong on Ukraine. He's not the only one. We all have the right to voice our opinion, but apparently, Congress isn't listening.
-
Level 11
Man, you’re all over the place…
“Tucker is right and Dan is wrong, but we all have the right to state our opinion”.
It perplexes me that you, Eli and the rest of the Putin lovers side with an ex-KGB piece of trash. My hope is that our support will break Russia, just like we did when the wall came crumbling down. I used to like Tucker and Hannity, but they’ve lost their minds when Trump got stomped. To each his own…I guess.
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 12
Too bad that you're not this passionate about our border and the fentanyl that pours through it.
Who's keeping track of the money being sent to Ukraine? You? Dan? Ben Stiller? Who's keeping track of all the weapons the United States have sent? You? Dan? Love these message board warriors thinking that war is just another video game. Why isn't anyone (including Dan and Mitch) interested in responsibility for the money and weapons we have sent? Tucker isn't your problem.
-
Level 13
You’re assuming there’s no accounting for the money and weapons being sent to the Ukraine…
That’s quite the assumption. You also assume that people who support the Ukraine don’t care what happens around our southern border.
Assume all you want, but the fact is that you, Eli, and Tucker are groveling fools when it comes to foreign policy and most other things. Fuck off
We're all born bald baby!-
Level 14
Yes, I'm assuming there is no accountability, and name calling isn't going to change that fact.
Show me where every cent is going and the location of every weapon we have sent. Better yet, maybe Dan will do it. The lives lost, the people left behind, the weaponry gift wrapped to the Taliban is still a fresh memory. Why would this time be any different?
-
Level 15
So, according to your low IQ…
assumptions are facts. You nor I know what’s being accounted for, so stop with the bullshit. While you’re at it, remove Trump’s balls from your mouth. It might provide you with a little clarity.
We're all born bald baby!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
End of conversation