Poll: Is it proper for the FBI try to restrict correct information from being published?
A: Yes, that is the proper domain of their agency. They should contact companies like Facebook and the NYT to stop the flow of correct information from getting to the public, and if they have to lie to them to do so (e.g., call it "Russian Disinformation" when the know it is not), it is proper that they do so.
B: No, their authority does not extend to censorship in general, and it does not enable them to contact private citizens and companies to lie to them to convince them to do what they cannot do directly, which is censorship. Any FBI agent who did that should be fired immediately, at a minimum.
Replies to: Poll: Is it proper for the FBI try to restrict correct information from being published?
Bigger threat: orange man or fascist collusion of Democrats-media-big tech? Trump, obviously.
(no message)
Which Trump fabrication is sticking to the wall more
Did the FBI/DOJ plant the documents before or after he declassified everything?
Or it doesn’t really matter to the cult and any justification or diversion is just fine.
Trying to divert from Trump's crimes by attacking law enforcement? #Losers
(no message)
Putin’s KGB are law enforcement also.
(no message)
^^^ BLM ^^^
(no message)
Inane - and really, you make no sense at all - is it proper?
Censorship? Whaaaaaa?
You just made this board infinitely dumber.
Guess we'll just ignore that they had Facebook censor pre-election posts.
Nothing to see here.
Yeah, Zuckerburg acted like he just did what they told him - they were in cahoots.
(no message)
Rogan went awfully easy on him
(no message)
More inaneness.
(no message)
And they don’t give a shit that the public knows. Scary.
(no message)
Move along, move along.
(no message)
Not to mention the 50+ signatures that said that was Russian Disinformation. I guess those
People lied and knew it was real but who gives a shit. It helped Biden so it’s all good.
Careful, Joe might send the FBI to your house to take that family cook book.
(no message)
Do you understand that sometimes information should not be made public…
…even if it is “correct”?
Like, for instance, info on the sources and methods used to gather US intelligence?
Do you understand that the FBI is in charge of US counterintelligence?
Sure, but that wasn't the issue here.
(no message)
Really?
(no message)
Yes, really. And additionally, He has the power to declassify everything he had&did so. #witchhunt.
(no message)
No, not everything. You learn slowly.
(no message)
Yes, everything he had. No nuclear codes or vital national defense info is in this &you know it…..
…..you think Biden’s Boys waited a year and a half until just before elections to carry this out when he had been cooperating?
Nothing in the redacted affidavit even hints at such information by the way.
Typical one-sided defense. If Obama had done this would you question the propriety/wisdom of such?
The legality of HOW he might have declassified info is debatable. Why no comment on the appropriateness? Will it matter if there is actual human intel in that trove which could endanger allies/spies?
Yeah… No … that’s just more idiocy that reigns supreme in the Republican Party.
Because someone said that, it doesn’t make it true and because more people repeat it it still doesn’t make it true.
What was on the laptop that should not have been shared? Anything that was a threat to
National security?
No, other than Joe possibly being compromised by Communist China, need to check with JimB
Waiting for JimB to review contents of laptop and apprise us as to veracity of emails, phone call messages from someone who says he is dad, videos of women in various stages of undress speaking with some individual smoking crack about how they have been treated and apportionment of anticipated funds coming from various Chinese entities; which maybe controlled by Communist Chinese military branches.
As soon as we get a run-down on the laptop by JimB we'll be in a better position to address whether or not the contents of the laptop could be perceived as a threat to national security.
Please note that I am not disparaging JimB, just saying that he'll give us a run-down or alternatively, either a diversion or derisive answer.
Patients is a virtue.
Well, I’ll need to wait until you tell us all what the law says.
As an attorney you have clearly defined the moving pieces of American law.
1 too many cat shots?
(no message)
Hearty - Har - Har. Arrgh
(no message)
I was in CAG 5, last crews with F4 VF-151 and 161 on Midway 84.
Then they transitioned to 18's.
Oh, you have a little bit of Midway Magic, eh?
HMH-462 MAG-36 El Toro; USS Princeton (honorary mayor of Olongapo, PI) VMO-2 MCAF Marble Mountain; VT-5 Barin Field ground school instr; VMFAT-501 MCAS Beaufort (8 A-4 hops then the big bird); VMFAT-101 MCAS El Toro; Continental Airlines MCAS Iwakuni, Japan; Pan Am to Kadena AFB; Pan Am to Danang; assigned VMFA-314, MAG-11 Chu Lai.
Oh Halleluiah, Halleluiah
Throw a nickel on the grass
Save a fighter pilot's ass
Oh Halleluiah, Halleluiah
Throw a nickel on the grass
And you'll be savedso
Nice run down. Yes, the Magic was awesome. I am glad we never met, my first
5 years in USN was an H-3 Crewman SAR Swimmer.
Never had to go in for an F4 Driver thank god.