Would you consider Ian book mediocre?
Will Book get pounded next week by clemson?
Replies to: Would you consider Ian book mediocre?
No. And no.
Book doesn’t have exceptional physical talent — not an elite arm or great size. But he’s good at a lot of things, which add up to a good QB. I see no reason why he would get “pounded” by Clemson. He played well the first time this season against Clemson.
Let s wait to see if he is mediocre in the NFL it's another level for sure
(no message)
Have you watched him play?
It should speak for itself.
Better than mediocre but not elite.
(no message)
Lol.
(no message)
Very good college QB. Beyond that ... time will tell. Changes in how the NFL is using QBs might work
in his favor.
Book doesn't have a great arm and his vision can be questioned at times.
That being said, there's not another QB I'd rather have starting for ND next Saturday.
No. Give the Book bashing a freaking rest.
(no message)
Mediocre? Anyone who considers Book mediocre is a fool...
and pretty much EVERYONE thought Book reached his "ceiling" last year...WRONG again. The kid wins...PERIOD.
A mediocre 30-3 and unbeaten in ND Stadium..
my bigger concern would be if Kelly will be able to keep winning consistently like this after Book leaves.
B&G has him in the MT Rushmore of ND QBs;that's far from mediocre
(no message)
No and I don’t believe so. He’s experienced and elusive.
(no message)
No and no. Why would I think he will get pounded? He didn’t last time.
(no message)
I wouldn't say Book is mediocre - I'd say he knows how to win and will use every bit
of his talents (a bit limited in size and arm strength) and football instincts to WIN......as for next week, I see Venables putting a "spy" on Book, playing their CB's in tight 1:1 coverage, and blitzing the whole game.
How to WIN. Yep!
(no message)
Pass Eff 31st, Pass Yds Per game 37th, Completions per game 51st. Draw your own conclusions.
(no message)
2 of those 3 are dependent on the type of offense you run.
Run/Pass distribution, plays per game, etc.
Exactly statistics have to have some thought applied to them before you determine their validity.
(no message)
30-3 as a starting QB.
(no message)
And 30-3 is the stat that counts.
(no message)
U DA MAN!
(no message)
