“James Skalski says Clemson was motivated by Notre Dame trash talk”
Replies to: “James Skalski says Clemson was motivated by Notre Dame trash talk”
That clown is a slow turd, who will not even sniff a CFL special teams unit....
Bama will run crossing route after crossing route and expose is 5.0 40 ass.....Hell, OSU will expose it all day
He exposed ours and that’s what really matters
(no message)
book’s comments were still dumb.
(no message)
No they weren't. He was just being competitive. What the heck is wrong with saying our 11 will be
there. Trash talk is overrated or accusing someone of doing it is such BS.
Irish fans made some obnoxious comments to T. Lawrence & others on the field after the first game
(no message)
I've heard that said as well. But, what was said? Was it more than just exuberance?
(no message)
That and arrogance
(no message)
Not sure. Did see a video with a student videotaping himself saying "bye-bye T. Lawrence" to him.
Simple taunt, and shouldn't be that big of a deal, but it is kind of stupid, when you know a champion like Lawrence will just turn it into motivation.
I doubt the result would be much different had those players NOT trash-talked
(no message)
They were more motivated because we won last time
(no message)
book and kelly think talking tough is being tough.
Best to keep their mouths shut.
Right now they both look like fools.
A high ranking black belt once told me:
“If you’re good, you don’t need to tell people.
They know”
Nothing more true....knock 'em on their butt....give 'em a hand to pick 'em up...and put 'em...
on their butt again. No words ever needed. Trash talk is for trash.
RAWR!
What sports did you play competitively and at waht (sic) level?
ND players were trash talking?
(no message)
During the last game but that usually goes both ways. Something must have been said... what’s the
saying, “ act like you’ve been here before”.
Not exactly. More like Ian kept at those who downplayed our W over Clemson.
(no message)
I cringed when I saw that interview....
It's one thing to defend the win if that was the only change to prove his mettle but he knew he was playing them literally days after that interview. Just keep quiet and don't get trapped into giving bulletin board material. If Book didn't know that himself, then someone should have briefed him.
Yup, called for "I'm looking forward to playing another great game w/Clemson." Really did not like
Ian leaning toward Trask in the Heisman race either, rather than "Tough choice since they're all such great players."
Book was all week long
(no message)
Can you tell me exactly what 'trashy' thing he said?
I did not see it. He did insist we beat Clemson because we played better. Hardly trash talking. Honestly, Skalski sounds like the kind of dick who would make something up like this. But maybe he isn't, and Book really said stuff that an objective person would say was 'trash' talking.
Part of the quote is in the link...
"... have all those people be quite once the game is over and we get this win."
He also interviewed on air during the final Clemson game of the season. There's no sense in any of that, just play the game and talk when it's over if you're so compelled.
Let’s all agree they didn’t lose the game because of trash talking
That’s poppycock.
Not 100% but would have been better to play the poor boy as Lou would do.
(no message)
Let’s all agree trash talking Clemson is cod dam stupid.
Especially when you get slaughtered.
Are you Arthur Treacher or sumphin?
(no message)
Totally agree...
we lost because we didn't capitalize on a strong opening quarter plus and allowed them to hit 3 blitz scores in the 2d quarter just like 2 years ago. With an inept offense, the game was over by half.
It certainly didn't help
(no message)
