Menu
UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting

UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting UHND.com - Notre Dame Football, Basketball, & Recruiting
  • Football
    • 2024 Notre Dame Football Schedule
    • 2024 Notre Dame Roster
    • 2024 Notre Dame Coaching Staff
    • Injury News & Updates
    • Notre Dame Football Depth Charts
    • Notre Dame Point Spreads & Betting Odds
    • Notre Dame Transfers
    • NFL Fighting Irish
    • Game Archive
    • Player Archive
    • Past Seasons & Results
  • Recruiting
    • Commits
    • News & Rumors
    • Class of 2018 Commit List
    • Class of 2019 Commit List
    • Class of 2020 Commit List
    • Class of 2021 Commit List
    • Archives
  • History
    • Notre Dame Bowl History
    • Notre Dame NFL Draft History
    • Notre Dame Football ESPN GameDay History
    • Notre Dame Heisman Trophy Winners
    • Notre Dame Football National Championships
    • Notre Dame Football Rivalries
    • Notre Dame Stadium
    • Touchdown Jesus
  • Basketball
  • Forums
    • Chat Room
    • Football Forum
    • Open Forum
    • Basketball Board
    • Ticket Exchange
  • Videos
    • Notre Dame Basketball Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Highlights
    • Notre Dame Football Recruiting Highlights
    • Notre Dame Player Highlights
    • Hype Videos
  • Latest News
  • Gear
  • About
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us
    • Our RSS Feeds
    • Community Rules
    • Privacy Policy
  • RSS
  • YouTube
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Home > Forums > Football Message Board
Login | Register
Upvote this post.
1
Downvote this post.

Lea cannot do two jobs. He's proved it. This is too important. Let him go and let Elston act as DC.

Author: ELP (9576 Posts - Joined: Oct 18, 2020)

Posted at 8:49 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Replies to: Lea cannot do two jobs. He's proved it. This is too important. Let him go and let Elston act as DC.


Thread Level: 2

We gave up 33 points in regulation in the win, 34 in the loss. Defense not the problem.

Author: jrdjr84 (1053 Posts - Joined: Jan 14, 2014)

Posted at 3:14 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Clark will be fine vs Bama, excellent defensive coach

Author: DonMiller (3087 Posts - Joined: Dec 20, 2016)

Posted at 9:46 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 2

Lea was not the issue. Rees had no answer for what Venables put together.

Author: wrdomerson (2263 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:10 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

He better find some or Alabama will do the exact same thing and shut us down in the same way.

Thread Level: 3

They went after our new center. We need Corell back.

Author: BaronVonZemo (59909 Posts - Joined: Nov 19, 2010)

Posted at 11:37 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

Rees was totally outclassed, you could tell that he lost focus, Kell should have taken over playcall

Author: pvm71 (793 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:21 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

which would have been just as bad

Thread Level: 4

3/4 of the way through the first half Kelly's eyes had glazed over and he was suffering from PTSD...

Author: TakethetrainKnute (33495 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:44 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

It's all over once he gets that look about him...

...which is a shame because scoring points in the Clemson game was important even if ND wasn't going to win.


Thread Level: 3

How about this for starters....??? When a defense is blitzing the $hit out of you all game......

Author: NEPA Irish (929 Posts - Joined: Aug 24, 2009)

Posted at 9:35 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

you throw at least one screen pass over the middle to either the TE or slip the RB out of the backfield. Rees didn't call 1 freakin' screen pass the whole game.....

Thread Level: 4

Never any short crossing routes or anything. Should have #25 back there in a 2 back set

Author: OklahomaIrishman (2907 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:43 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

They were both a problem. Rees was bad but, Lea's defense was poorly prepared.

Author: NDavenue (7489 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:22 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

I don't believe illusions because too much is for real.
Thread Level: 4

As noted by others, the D faired about the same this time around as it did last time points wise.

Author: wrdomerson (2263 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:18 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

I agree with THEISMANCARR that Lawrence's ability to run was sorely missed by Clemson in the first game. We had to adjust to respect it instead of only focusing on Etienne, which gave him more room.

They have a great offense with a lot of talent, and they made plays. Our offense did not.


Thread Level: 4

I keep saying it and will continue to do so....a team plays the way it practices!!! I would bet....

Author: NEPA Irish (929 Posts - Joined: Aug 24, 2009)

Posted at 9:42 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

Kelly's teams do very little live tackling/blocking....we have seen this "Irish Clown of a Coach's" teams over the past 11 seasons, come out flat, poor tackling, lack of physicality, etc. especially after a bye week or weeks leading up to a bowl game. I have always said, Kelly is lazy and his teams show it on the field. The Syracuse game was a prime example...his team didn't want to play that game at all and their (lack of) performance showed it!

Thread Level: 5

Oh come on the big difference was Lawrence's ability to run the ball and execute the read option to

Author: THEISMANCARR (17199 Posts - Joined: Aug 10, 2007)

Posted at 10:04 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

a near perfect efficiency. We did improve in the second half and even Lawrence cannot play to the efficiency and excellence he displayed Saturday. We can win if we play our best and they do not play their best.

Thread Level: 6

Bigger difference was game 1 Book versus game 2 Book.

Author: jrdjr84 (1053 Posts - Joined: Jan 14, 2014)

Posted at 3:16 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 6

Read here multiple times how the Freshman we beat was just as good as Lawrence...

Author: TakethetrainKnute (33495 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:22 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

That was good for a chuckle...

Thread Level: 7

Maybe as a passer, but not runnng, or reads, progressions, etc.He threw for more yards than TL ever

Author: irishone (2066 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:58 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

ever did.

Thread Level: 8

He's a talent. Still a Freshman...versus the best quarterback in college right now....

Author: TakethetrainKnute (33495 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 11:06 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Thread Level: 3

an interesting read...

Author: WestCoastIrishFan (16209 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 9:16 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

(no message)

Link: http://smartfootball.com/offense/why-every-team-should-apply-the-constraint-theory-of-offense

Thread Level: 4

I think this is a bit of out of date.

Author: lacan (1433 Posts - Joined: Apr 24, 2015)

Posted at 2:52 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

It predates the ... uhm ... spread of tempo spread RPO offenses, on account of which Saban concluded great defense is no longer enough: you have to be able to outscore opponents. (Saban, as you may recall, tried to halt this from happening by calling for stricter rules for and enforcement of linemen down field penalties and argued it was dangerous for the health of defenders not to give the defense time to substitute. When all that failed, he went if-you-can't-beat-them-join-them ... with a vengeance.)

These links might be helpful:

X’S & O’S: RUN-PASS OPTION (RPO) SIMPLIFIED
ITP Glossary: Pre-Snap RPO Reads
lITP Glossary: Post-Snap RPO Reads

Only one team in the playoffs does not employ RPOs as part of its base offense. Guess which one.


This message has been edited 1 time(s).

Thread Level: 5

I was trying to point out the need to do things to "constrain" what the defense is trying to do to

Author: WestCoastIrishFan (16209 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:04 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

stop your bread and butter. Screens and the such to slow down blitz. ND made zero adjustments against Clemson.

Thread Level: 6

They're going to do what they do and we're going to do what we do is what he usually says.

Author: lacan (1433 Posts - Joined: Apr 24, 2015)

Posted at 8:49 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

He might add, and we're not going to prepare for anything else in case what we do isn't working. That's been ok when ND is the much more talented team -- most of the time -- not so much when it's not.

Thread Level: 4

Much appreciated, that was a good read.

Author: wrdomerson (2263 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 10:38 am on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

So do you think this was us?

"But be wary of constraint plays against very talented teams — they may be stuffing your core offense not because they are cheating, but instead because they are better than you; the constraint plays then play into their hands."

I do think losing Patterson hurt, I was worried about our chances in a revenge game, especially without our starting center. I did feel like they were "cheating" to take away the run and make Book uncomfortable, but it is beyond me to see the plays called, so I don't know what constraint plays we tried that should have been the answer to what Venables plan was. Since their plan was to make Book stay in the pocket, I feel like an answer should have been to move the pocket by design or have more rollouts. It would be nice for Greg to put together an article on what they did to us and what we tried to do in answer to it.


Thread Level: 5

I was surprised they didn't try some mid-line screens, quick passes to the TEs, mesh routes in the

Author: WestCoastIrishFan (16209 Posts - Original UHND Member)

Posted at 7:07 pm on Dec 21, 2020
View Single

middle of the field. Kelly's offense is largely dependent on 4 verticals, which takes times to develop. I really think a lot of the O's problem is about the route system ND uses. Watch how Alabama uses the width and depth of the field; I don't see Kelly's routes using levels and forcing a DB to make a choice of which receive to cover.

Close
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • RSS