There have been many debates about this lately. I believe completion percentage is a key indicator of accuracy and even a sole indicator when looking at a whole game, season or career. Let me explain why I feel this way.
It is true that completion percentage alone isn't the single measurement for accuracy. On-target percentages and catchable percentages are used too.
The numbers below are average numbers across multiple seasons and don't account for any kind of distance.
Russell Wilson - 65% completions, 73% on-target, 79% catchable
Teddy Bridgewater - 67% completions, 74% on-target, 79% catchable
Baker Mayfield - 61% completions, 70% on-target, 76% catchable
Patrick Mahomes - 66% completions, 72% on-target, 78% catchable
What is the trend here? Do you see a pattern? While we don't have this information on Pyne it's reasonable to expect that in order for Pyne to complete 70% of his passes he would need to throw a higher percentage of on-target balls and even higher percentage of catchable balls.
Another source link
https://www.sisdatahub.com/players/5048
Link: https://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/analysis/quarterback-accuracy-expected-on-target-percentage-baker-mayfield-russell-wilson/
shooting. But, by your definition, he’s be an amazing shooter. One of the best shooters ever.
Just like completing what are essentially glorified handoffs doesn’t make you an accurate thrower regardless of whether you complete 100% of them or not.
The accuracy with which an individual is capable of throwing a football and completion percentage are two completely different things.
(no message)
shooter of a basketball just like a high completion percentage on short easy throws or tosses does not make one a super accurate thrower of a football.
Completion percentage and accuracy are two completely different things.
because he was so bad at shooting the ball. This is a very silly comparison.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
on-target.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
how good or bad the WRs actually are.
A low comp% relative to on-target and catchable means the WRs are not doing their job.
A high comp% relative to on-target and catchable means the WRs are doing more than their job. Making the QB look good.
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
win.
BTW... Do you even realize or know what Teddy did in college at Louisville? Only slayed a few giants and put them on the map? Maybe????
(no message)
(no message)
If he’s so good?
(no message)
(no message)
(no message)
60% completion, 67% on-target, 89% catchable