Anyone up for a 2 QB system?
I have never been in favor of it until my nephew reminded me of how Urban Meyer used Leak & Tebow. I'm not saying any of the current QB's have that type of talent but it might play to their strong suit. Buchner was definitely a Red Zone Qb.
Replies to: Anyone up for a 2 QB system?
circle meet jerk
(no message)
😂😂😂
(no message)
I don't like our QB situation at all given the current landscape of CFB
I mean, I like the talent on the roster and the potential. But, having 4 options that all seem good means you have no clear starter, which isn't what you want, and 3 potential to likely transfers.
We'll see how it plays out. Setting Leonard aside due to eligibility, how crappy would it be to see any of the other 3 do better elsewhere?
Carr will start in 2025.
Angeli or Minchey will likely hit the portal next week.
Four is a crowd.
When he does I might have to change my handle to Carrtheismanncarr.
(no message)
You should probably fire that mechanic...
(no message)
With almost certainty 1 will leave after spring. It won’t be carr
Or Leonard. My vote is minchey. Carr sounds likley to rise up the chart and minchey isn’t passing Angeli.
And perhaps next year Carr might be what u want, a clear cut #1. Time will tell. I know spring reports don’t mean much after spring but this kid might be the real deal. Physical talent and an really good mental grasp of the game
Angeli should transfer to Rutgers...
...perfect match. Minchey has more promise. Carr could grow into QB1 after the A&M game if Leonard goes down, God forbid. It's a very weak schedule ..let him cut his teeth. Angeli wants to start, so let him - at Rutgers!
Every playoff team needs a solid #2 at the least. Long season.
(no message)
That won't be easy because most high quality #2's will Portal out.
(no message)
It’s a very good question…
That I don’t have an answer to. I think all coaches might say, yes, if it helps our team. It is harder to manage than QB1. But yes I think in theory it can work.
You know what I hate about the two QB system. The other team knows what the QBs are put in for also.
I say you run the same type plays if one has to substitute for the other but generally the two QB system is not sustainable.
This has been an issue for years. We tell our plays by what RBs
And QBs are in and alignment. I call the majority of the plays pre snap and I don’t know much about football.
Now everybody knows!
(no message)
I am pretty damn sure that everyone we played can notice
Pretty easily. Then it comes down the execution and against equal or better teams u don’t get good results.
Why stop there? Let's use all four
(no message)
That's just not a recipe for sustained success. Meyer did not have a 2 QB system in '06
Tim Tebow was a situational QB as a freshman. He had certain packages that were for specific situations. Chris Leak was the recognized QB1 on that team.
ND used something similar in '21 with Coan and Buchner.
You know the saying about having two starting QBs. It has pretty much held true most of the time. I would be very leery if that became the situation with this ND team.