The game plan takes advantage of what he can do, which is run, and throw for the most part accurate short passes when he's not pressured.
But we all know there will be one or more games going forward where the defense will have answers for Leonard and the question at that point becomes, will the staff be willing to admit the obvious that he would need to be replaced?
I hate to say it, but with Leonard, we are running basically a modified service academy option offense with a little more passing.
(no message)
A bash. Just the truth.
(no message)
https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4686164/tai-lavatai
https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/stats/_/id/4879928/bryson-daily
https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/stats/_/id/4580590/zac-larrier
Link: https://www.espn.com/college-football/player/_/id/4686164/tai-lavatai
Leak was the passer and Tebow was the bruising runner. It can be done, but it is really rare.
Would ND follow that model?
(no message)
(no message)