It's interesting that all of the criticism of RL (and some of it deserved), everyone is blaming.....

running ability was off the charts. A key game for him was against Georgia. We could have won that game with a break or two, a turnover less, or better preparation for that last play call on defense by Georgia. They blitzed from the right side and caused the fumble that ended it. Ironically two years later the same blitz was called from the left side, which I could not believe we weren't ready for, and Book was forced to scramble and throw up a prayer at the end to Claypool who was held down trying to jump for it, which was clearly interference. We definitely should have beaten Georgia the year Book played.

but you only like objective truth with it favors your crusade of the moment.

I said the following:
-RL wasn't a high level passer before he got hurt (objective truth)
-the passing success he did have was mostly from his threat as a runner opening up easy passes (objective truth)
-then he missed the spring which compounded things (more objective truth)

Didn't think I needed to mention that he missed spring, at a new school, with new team mates, new coaches, and a new offensive system since even though it's all objective truth, it's also just common damned sense.