He's getting $2MM. In every quarterback statistic that matters, he was nowhere near the top. And he was at his worst in the biggest games. He then held out of team activities and shopped himself around looking for a 200% raise.
I do get your point about the players simply doing what they're being incentivized to do, but this case is different, in my opinion.
Won't be surprised if, in a few years, this kid and the Rashada kid are filing for bankruptcy because their advisors took everything and ran when the money train stops.
I suppose that all payments would only be made AFTER the playoffs and none would be owned if there was any breach.
This is only off the top of my head and I don't draft these kinds of agreements. I'm sure there are a ton of other enforcement clauses that could be drafted.
Can a booster pay the player to show up to a game and play in it.
I was thinking NIL value (the value being sold by the player and supposedly purchased by the booster) would increase with playing time...especially in playoff games. So, you could structure payments based on that in addition to just showing up in an ad. But, I don't know.
More fundamental: Can a third party outright pay a player to perform in an otherwise amateur sport? If not, why not?
I assume these answers are out there, but I haven't looked into them.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
The schools could form a professional league to employ the players, and try to qualify for the same type of legal status that one of the other professional leagues have.
Eventually, the schools will just be licensing their logos, and sharing in profits......and then "college football" will cease to exist. It will just be another professional sport league.
Evil preaches tolerance until it is dominant, then it tries to silence good.
To be controlled. This is far worse than professional sports leagues where a contract bonds players and teams for a defined term which is almost never 1 year.
The whole moving around every season crap has to stop or be severely curtailed.
Elsewhere if u have a contract in place. No way he should get another deal at another school because he doesn’t like this one short of behind released from it.
U can’t do that in the nfl unless u broker a trade or a release but the team is obligated to cooperate.
These joke contracts are payment for name, image and likeness only while you are at that institution though.
I think that we all know this is a farce, but that is what they are nominally for. If you leave they cease by their nature, since they could conceivably still pay for your "name, image and likeness" (which still exists at your next landing spot) but, of course, they only wish to pay for it at Tennessee say...and not at a North Carolina...or elsewhere.
If he had numbers like Trevor Lawrence, then most folks here would said that paying him more would have been worth it.
Iamaleava had decent, but not great, numbers.
213-334 passing, 2616 yards, 19 TD, 5 INT.
I wouldn't have said that his current pay of $2.4 million would have justified that, much less the $4 million he was allegedly demanding. You have to earn your keep, after all.
That offense was centered around their superstar RB, Dylan Sampson, and he's the only guy on that team that I would have said deserved a pay raise (his NIL pay was $1 million in 2024) had he stayed.