Life ain't fair. The Stanford game was a hyper-blowout. Marcus should have given Williams more touches just to maintain his focus. Never know when you may need a guy to step up.
Link: Notre Dame Veteran Walks Away From Media After Losing Role in 58-7 Blowout
That factually states:
Aneyas Williams entered the season as the notionally feature RB
Jonaz Walton had significantly more carries with excellent production
Nolan James also had more carries than Williams with excellent production
Then draws the inference:
Aneyas Williams may be bummed by a potential reduction in utilization
Which is a completely normal response from a very competitive player.
What is so objectionable about the factual statements in the article and the rational inference that it draws?
It might be "rational" if it were written about Terrell Owens or Randy Moss because that's what players like that do.
By all accounts, Aneyas Williams is nothing but a great teammate and leader on the team. By ALL accounts.
His coaches can't say enough good things about the leader and person he is. His teammates say he's not only a great teammate but also helps them prepare and understand the offense better, so they can be better and help the team more. The announcers that cover the games and have interviewed him say the same things.
Suggesting he's pouting because he's not getting the touches or having the production he wants goes completely against everything everyone says about the kid.
Total BS click bait and you probably would have seen that if you knew anything about the team and it's players. Or, maybe you just like the attention you get from posting BS.
You're not entitling Williams to the normal human emotions which the article suggests he may be experiencing.
If I or you were a starter on a team and got relegated downward, would either of us be completely sanguine about the circumstance?
That Williams is a great teammate and may also be disappointed about the evolution of his status is not disjoint.
terrible AI written article.
I would take that with an entire shaker of salt. brand.fejo.io doesn't look exactly like a standard news article.
I don't doubt that he would feel frustrated at not being able to be the best producing back at this time, but the fact that Coach Freeman still has him as RB1 tells a different story than the above link .
What about the analysis does not work for you? The observations and inferences generated given the data are rational.
Here again, the fact that Coach Freeman still lists him as RB1 basically puts that article in the "mostly bunk" category.