Are either our O or D any better schematically or game plan wise since Ash/Denbrock took over?
Id say the D is a definite downgrade and on O we are treading water absent talent upgrades that is. The O is about as vanilla as it gets.
Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 3 posts
-
Level 1
Both are afflicted by the same disease, & time, by Miami, will reveal if Freeman is the carrier. N
either coach sets up the players for success. The standard reply is "we just need to execute better" which harkens back to the time of Kelly. Denbrock is receiving universal criticism ( i was ahead of of the curve by a couple years) for his boring offense that requires superb athletes who can beat the defense 100% of the time. Ash, especially in the biggest games, limits the athletes on the defense from being athletes. We will be able tell in the first series against Miami if BYU was a wake up call or just a need for better execution. My guess is it will be latter, and ND can start looking forward to 2027.
-
Level 2
Yep. For what theyre being paid ND should expect innovative schemes not pedestrian management and
blaming the employees/students for execution failure. Some coaches do actually affect or effect winning. Take Sitake for example.
-
End of conversation