Back to threaded view
Full conversation · 3 posts

NW running the wing T has everything our running game lacks

jrdjr84 1274 posts Joined:
Posted

Creativity, misdirection, catching the defense out of position, explosive plays for less explosive athletes.
You know who ran the wing T successfully at Notre Dame? Ara Pareghian.
Chip Kelly is smart enough to do what's counterintuitive. When he first became prominent, it was going no-huddle up-tempo. Everyone does that now. But no one runs the wing T except....

  • Level 1

    Many teams, BYU included, provide plenty of eye candy for the defense from shotgun.

    ND does not, nor did they during the Kelly, Denbrock, Rees years.

    It matters and it's a big reason ND has struggled against good defenses during those seasons.

    Get a good OC and this will get fixed. It won't under Denbrock, no matter what CMF does.

    • Level 2

      Having played at DII level back in the 70's in the halcyon days of the Wing T, hated playing against

      teams that ran the scheme (Parseghian's teams ran it well).....The Wing T was built around a series of plays that began with nearly identical backfield action: buck sweep, trap, waggle (play-action pass), & counter. The offensive line, backs, and quarterback showed the same initial movements. Defenders often couldn't tell whether they were seeing a sweep, trap, counter, or pass until it was too late. It created hesitation & defensive football is about reading keys and reacting quickly. The Wing T intentionally corrupted those keys.

      Love that offense - can never figure out why it disappeared......????

End of conversation