-
Level 1
Did you read the article? Basically, it was about how Carr is NOT a heisman player, his vote
is for Sellers from SC. Which is crazy since Sellers is not even a top 10 QB in the SEC and ranks 18th in the QBPR and on a team that won't be ranked at the end of the year.
-
Level 2
I have always seen Carr's path to the Heisman as difficult..
simply because he is not a dual threat. What most cannot see is his prep work and his ability to recognize defenses and change plays before the snap. He is as advanced as they come in this dept., or so we are told as we cannot see or know what takes place in his head. Like us all, the Heisman voters are void of that info. also, and most if not all will never understand. What speaks to that though is his TD/interception ratio, third and fourth down success, and team success.
It will always be a tough choice for voters to understand, but he will need two or three successful playoff games for that aspect to become apparent. Otherwise, what most see will be another Steve Angeli.
-
Level 3
Unfortunately, the voting happens before Carr can prove himself in the playoffs.
(no message)
-
-
Level 2
It's a dopey take. His "eye test" says Carr is not a worthy Heisman candidate off of THIS game.
Carr looked extremely Heisman-worthy in the Miami game.
I was actually at the South Carolina game. Sellers had a gutsy game and showed a lot of character on Saturday in a tight game against a mediocre A&M team. That said, he's not in the Heisman conversation.
-
Level 3
Carr checks to the SAFE play most of the time, so he doesn't look SPECIAL - although his decision
making is actually his SUPERPOWER and what makes him Heisman worthy.
If voters are just looking for Johnny Manziel slinging the ball around as your ideal Heisman candidate, than Carr will definitely not fit your paradigm.
-